If you ever watched a trailer before you watched the actual movie you might have noticed that the design of the title that appeared on the silver screen was different from the title you’d seen before in the trailer.

One might expect that a film would have it’s own ‘corporate identity.’ One title design as a logo for the film, used in the advertising and promotional campaign, the poster, packaging, the credits in the movie itself. When you look at the images below you’ll notice this isn’t always the case. The typography or logo for the film used for the poster oftentimes appears in the trailer, but surprisingly hardly ever in the movie itself.

The images below show the main movie title on the left, the trailer title on the right, and a detail of its poster in the middle.

Sweeney Todd:
The titles from the poster reappear in a slightly different form in the trailer. A less detailed version is used for the main movie titles.

The assassination of Jesse James by the coward Robert Ford:
The title and credits at the beginning of a movie are normally designed to put the viewer in a certain mood. I’m not sure if they tried to do so here, but if they did they failed. In case you haven’t seen it: it’s a western! Westerns usually have their own typographic language, something the designer of the trailer understood better. They probably hired a third designer for the poster and a fourth to do the packaging.

No country for old men:
The same title design is used for the poster, as well as the trailer and the cover of the DVD, but a cliché font is used for the main title as it appears in the movie.

Burn after reading:
Like The assassination of Jesse James by the coward Robert Ford, the ‘corporate identity’ of this movie is a mess. The design of the Saul Bass style poster is used for the packaging, but there’s no trace of it in the title credits and the trailer.

Death proof:
The grungy retro typography of the poster has been used for the trailer, but the main title that appears in the movie is again ‘just a font.’

Movies with budgets of tens of millions of dollars are made every year. Millions are spent on advertising campaigns featuring posters, websites and trailers with appealing images and slick design to draw audiences into the theatres. Some of the major studios hire specialized firms to design opening sequences, which are sometimes even better than the film that follows them. Other studios don’t seem to give title design much priority.

A few decades ago, only audiences in cinemas would watch movie trailers. Today, movie trailers have become extremely popular on the internet. Of some 10-billion videos watched online annually, movie trailers rank #3, after news and user-created video.

To see the difference between the main titles and trailer titles of recent films I added a new trailer titles page to the Movie title stills collection. Some pretty well designed titles, but overall not as good as I expected. Just a few of those titles are ‘logos’ for the movies they represent, the majority of the titles are ‘just fonts.’

See for yourself: trailers from 2005 to 2009. Scroll over the trailer titles to view the main titles.More trailer titles can be found here: 1930s | 1940s | 1950s | 1960s | 1970s

One response to “New page added: trailers 2005-2009”

yavno Posted on October 13, 2009 at 1:25 am

I have to disagree. You brand a film on the poster and marketing to draw attention quickly but the opening title is a different story. You don’t need to market the film within itself. These fonts although simple are far more effective in the film than their graphic counterparts. The Jesse James, No Country, and Death Proof main titles are simple and clean in order to set a clean aesthetic for the cinematography, and not pollute it with a “logo”.